On 11/11/10 17:23, Eric Blake wrote:
> It's nice to provide a ChangeLog entry, either as a patch to ChangeLog
> itself or as the commit message (or both; if you use Jim's vc-dwim pacage).
True, hadn't dotted my "i"s nor crossed my "t"s yet.
>> /* The calling program should define program_name an
Bruce Korb wrote:
> This patch modifies lib/error.c so that should someone
> call it without having set program_name, then a message
> is printed and abort() called instead of seg faulting.
A link error would be best, to detect this situation.
If we cannot get a link error, an abort() is a small i
On 11/11/2010 05:09 PM, Bruce Korb wrote:
> This patch modifies lib/error.c so that should someone
> call it without having set program_name, then a message
> is printed and abort() called instead of seg faulting.
It's not clear that this is a win. The current code,
in glibc and in most other C l
On 11/11/2010 06:09 PM, Bruce Korb wrote:
> This patch modifies lib/error.c so that should someone
> call it without having set program_name, then a message
> is printed and abort() called instead of seg faulting.
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] give a sensible error message when error() is called
> witho
This patch modifies lib/error.c so that should someone
call it without having set program_name, then a message
is printed and abort() called instead of seg faulting.
>From 70e49cdeba9becf444c6b6a6c6bd74e8fe6b80e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bruce Korb
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 08:46:00 -0800
Subje
