Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > The gnulib modules file is the canonical place, which says LGPLv2+. For
> > historical reasons the header file says GPLv2+.
>
> Hmmm, would it make sense to update the header (possible keeping the
> historical part as a comment)?
The header is updated automatically whe
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 02:46:16PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Sylvain Beucler writes:
> > The license of the MD5 module is documented as LGPLv2+, but the source
> > headers say it's under the GPLv2+, and that it's part of the (LGPL)
> > libc.
> >
> > What is the actual license? :)
>
> The gn
Sylvain Beucler writes:
> Hi,
>
> The license of the MD5 module is documented as LGPLv2+, but the source
> headers say it's under the GPLv2+, and that it's part of the (LGPL)
> libc.
>
> What is the actual license? :)
The gnulib modules file is the canonical place, which says LGPLv2+. For
histo
Hi,
The license of the MD5 module is documented as LGPLv2+, but the source
headers say it's under the GPLv2+, and that it's part of the (LGPL)
libc.
What is the actual license? :)
--
Sylvain
