On 05/07/2011 05:32 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
So, my vote for the license of libposix would be LGPLv3+ | GPLv2+.
For that I agree.
However, relicensing-wise, the best path to achieving this, is to first
ensure that all gnulib modules meant for libposix are LGPLv2+. Then
libposix can be distri
Eric Blake wrote:
> In fact, given the earlier question about libposix (should it
> be LGPLv2+ or LGPLv3+), we may be repeating our line of questioning.
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> In fact, shouldn't we aim at LGPLv2+ for libposix, since that's the
> glibc license?
Because of the known advantages of
