Hello Bruno, Richard, all,
* Bruno Haible wrote on Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 02:03:06AM CET:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> > The request brings up the issue of what the limits of what can be in
> > gnulib. I'm not sure it is a useful discussion...
>
> My opinion: If it's "common" in the sense that
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Anyway, for example,
>> libtasn1 is used by GnuTLS, Shishi, and probably some other projects as
>> well, and I have thought about proposing parts of it as gnulib modules.
>> Probably the only reason I haven't done so already is because the code
>> is qui
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I'd like to know whether Gnulib developers would be interested in
> > taking on an XDR implementation (based on the one in glibc)?
Yes, this definitely can have its place in gnulib, because it is glibc
functionality that is not present on all other systems. You can l
"Richard W.M. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I maintain portableXDR (http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/portablexdr/)
> which is an XDR library for Windows and Macs. As far as I'm aware it
> is only used by libvirt (http://libvirt.org/), and only on platforms
> which lack any XDR library (ie. Win
I maintain portableXDR (http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/portablexdr/)
which is an XDR library for Windows and Macs. As far as I'm aware it
is only used by libvirt (http://libvirt.org/), and only on platforms
which lack any XDR library (ie. Windows) or a usable XDR library (Macs
and other Unix systems
