-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jim Meyering on 10/9/2008 2:39 AM:
> Did you consider using "_version" as the new target name?
> With that, GNUmakefile impinges less on the name space of all
> subsidiary Makefiles.
Sure, that looks like a good improvement.
- --
Don't w
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> + GNUmakefile: add 'make version' target
> + * top/GNUmakefile (_curr-ver): Split version update rules...
> + (version): ...into a target.
Hi Eric,
That looks like a fine change.
Did you consider using "_version" as the new target name?
With
Ralf Wildenhues gmx.de> writes:
> * Eric Blake wrote on Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 04:38:00PM CEST:
[Revisiting an older thread]
> > > > Well, I tried to make it a hard error, so that it would be the only
> > > > output, but others on the list convinced me to reduce it back to a
> > > > warning. I d
* Eric Blake wrote on Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 02:17:01PM CEST:
> According to Ralf Wildenhues on 8/28/2008 1:39 AM:
> >
> > Pause is not good. It doesn't scale with system speed, it doesn't
> > parallelize, who looks at build logs interactively anyway, except
> > to get annoyed by the fact that it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Ralf Wildenhues on 8/28/2008 1:39 AM:
>
> Pause is not good. It doesn't scale with system speed, it doesn't
> parallelize, who looks at build logs interactively anyway, except
> to get annoyed by the fact that it's still not done yet?
I
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> This whole issue is getting more and more abstruse, ever since it
> was decided that the version should contain the git string, but at
> the same time autoconf should not rerun upon each version string
> change.
I agree that more thought needs to be put into solving this i
Hi Eric,
* Eric Blake wrote on Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 04:38:00PM CEST:
> Denny Joel E cs.clemson.edu> writes:
>
> > > Well, I tried to make it a hard error, so that it would be the only
> > > output, but others on the list convinced me to reduce it back to a
> > > warning. I don't know of any GNU
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Blake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: GNUmakefile: git-version-gen, maintainer-check, install
> Denny Joel E cs.clemson.edu> writes:
>
>> > Well, I tried to make it a h
Denny Joel E cs.clemson.edu> writes:
> > Well, I tried to make it a hard error, so that it would be the only
> > output, but others on the list convinced me to reduce it back to a
> > warning. I don't know of any GNU make construct to make it appear last.
> > Maybe we just insert a sleep 10 afte
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Jim Meyering wrote:
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
According to Jim Meyering on 8/26/2008 2:18 AM:
Hi Joel,
How about this instead?
Then it can be changed arbitrarily on a per-project basis.
From 6e4373f0b071f6b604ce343e8267e45d25bf4aa6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
F
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Eric Blake wrote:
According to Joel E. Denny on 8/26/2008 1:28 AM:
On Sat, 9 Aug 2008, Joel E. Denny wrote:
Also, I noticed that the stale version warning for make install always
scrolls out of the terminal window. I never notice it unless I'm looking
for it, so it's not
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to Jim Meyering on 8/26/2008 2:18 AM:
>> Hi Joel,
>> How about this instead?
>> Then it can be changed arbitrarily on a per-project basis.
>>
>>>From 6e4373f0b071f6b604ce343e8267e45d25bf4aa6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PRO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jim Meyering on 8/26/2008 2:18 AM:
> Hi Joel,
> How about this instead?
> Then it can be changed arbitrarily on a per-project basis.
>
>>From 6e4373f0b071f6b604ce343e8267e45d25bf4aa6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jim Meyering <[EMAIL P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Joel E. Denny on 8/26/2008 1:28 AM:
> On Sat, 9 Aug 2008, Joel E. Denny wrote:
>
>> Also, I noticed that the stale version warning for make install always
>> scrolls out of the terminal window. I never notice it unless I'm looking
>> f
"Joel E. Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Aug 2008, Joel E. Denny wrote:
>> I frequently run make maintainer-check during Bison development. I don't
>> see a need to update VERSION every time. Is the following patch
>> acceptable, or would it be better to rename maintainer-check* to
On Sat, 9 Aug 2008, Joel E. Denny wrote:
> Also, I noticed that the stale version warning for make install always
> scrolls out of the terminal window. I never notice it unless I'm looking
> for it, so it's not doing me much good. Is there any way to print it
> last?
This is the error messag
On Sat, 9 Aug 2008, Joel E. Denny wrote:
> I frequently run make maintainer-check during Bison development. I don't
> see a need to update VERSION every time. Is the following patch
> acceptable, or would it be better to rename maintainer-check* to something
> else in Bison?
Here's a more fo
Hi,
I frequently run make maintainer-check during Bison development. I don't
see a need to update VERSION every time. Is the following patch
acceptable, or would it be better to rename maintainer-check* to something
else in Bison?
--- ../../gnulib/top/GNUmakefile2008-08-06 18:31:57.0
18 matches
Mail list logo
