Reuben Thomas wrote:
Is this line (which was in the initial commit of this code) intentional? A
stub for future enhancement? It would seem to need some expansion, at the
very least for Windows.
My guess is that the code was stolen from similar code
such as AM_PATH_PROG_WITH_TEST (in m4/progtest
for exec_ext in ''; do
Is this line (which was in the initial commit of this code) intentional? A
stub for future enhancement? It would seem to need some expansion, at the
very least for Windows.
I'm writing a Perl version of relocatable-script for systems that lack a
shell (I'm targeting
