Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 2023-05-31 04:57, Bruno Haible wrote:
>
> > But I think it would be good to write
> >Copyright-paperwork-exempt: yes
> > (like everyone else does), not
> >Copyright-paperwork-exempt: true
>
> Yes, that was my intent; I merely
On 2023-05-31 04:57, Bruno Haible wrote:
But I think it would be good to write
Copyright-paperwork-exempt: yes
(like everyone else does), not
Copyright-paperwork-exempt: true
Yes, that was my intent; I merely forgot whether it was "yes" or "true".
Adding this to HACKING sounds good.
On 5/31/23 13:57, Bruno Haible wrote:
I see this "Copyright-paperwork-exempt" annotation for the first time.
I like it, since
* The ChangeLog is meant to record this information [1], but when
ChangeLogs are generated from git history, this information must
obviously be
Paul Eggert wrote:
> Thanks, I installed that.
> Copyright-paperwork-exempt: true
I see this "Copyright-paperwork-exempt" annotation for the first time.
I like it, since
* The ChangeLog is meant to record this information [1], but when
ChangeLogs are generated from g
e, so
> I'll wait for an ACK before I push.
That's great! Please go right ahead :-)
Cheers,
Gary
> Jim
>
> From 9301160f1f63d1193402a4cecf17c33da2305020 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "Gary V. Vaughan"
> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:47:55 +0100
> Subj
I push.
Jim
>From 9301160f1f63d1193402a4cecf17c33da2305020 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Gary V. Vaughan"
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:47:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gitlog-to-changelog: Copyright-paperwork-exempt: yes ==
(tiny change)
* build-aux/gitlog-to-changelog (main): Map the string, at beginning
of lin
