On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 20:30 +0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Torvald Riegel wrote:
> > IMHO, gnulib synchronization primitives should simply move towards the
> > semantics chosen by C++11 and more recent (if you dislike C++ for some
> > reason, just use the C++ semantics applied to C11; C is lacking be
Torvald Riegel wrote:
> IMHO, gnulib synchronization primitives should simply move towards the
> semantics chosen by C++11 and more recent (if you dislike C++ for some
> reason, just use the C++ semantics applied to C11; C is lacking behind
> in terms of preciseness of the specification).
>
> Of c
