Re: --version output change proposal

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Karl Berry on 3/22/2007 2:30 PM: > rms wanted to use a specific url after all. Thus, please use: > > License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later > \n\ Committed, with that change. - -- Don't work too h

Re: --version output change proposal

+License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later \n\ +This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.\n\ rms wanted to use a specific url after all. Thus, please use: License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later \n\

Re: --version output change proposal

Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > According to Jim Meyering on 3/19/2007 2:45 AM: >> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes: If any comments, let me know before we inscribe it into standards.texi ... >>> I suppose lib/version.c in gnulib shou

Re: --version output change proposal

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Jim Meyering on 3/19/2007 2:45 AM: > Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes: >>> If any comments, let me know before we inscribe it into standards.texi ... >> I suppose lib/version.c in gnulib s

Re: --version output change proposal

Hello Karl, > sort (GNU coreutils) 6.4 > Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. > There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. My gu

Re: --version output change proposal

However, some legal nitpickers might say that the line "you are free to change and redistribute it" establishes different licensing You are right, it might happen, but I just can't get too excited about catering to such people. It would be a truly outrageous interpretation of a simple exp

Re: --version output change proposal

Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes: >> If any comments, let me know before we inscribe it into standards.texi ... > > I suppose lib/version.c in gnulib should be modified too? Yep, version-etc.c I'll wait a day or two, in case things change.

Re: --version output change proposal

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes: > rms and I have been batting around the --version output stuff. > Here's what we seem to be settling on: > > sort (GNU coreutils) 6.4 > Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later

Re: --version output change proposal

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) wrote: > rms and I have been batting around the --version output stuff. > Here's what we seem to be settling on: > > sort (GNU coreutils) 6.4 > Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later

--version output change proposal

rms and I have been batting around the --version output stuff. Here's what we seem to be settling on: sort (GNU coreutils) 6.4 Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later This is free software: you are free to change an