Re: [bug-gnulib] [patch] feature enhancement for gnulib-tool

2006-10-20 Thread Bruno Haible
Charles Wilson wrote: > The problem comes down to assignment. Some of the variables in the > section emitted by gnulib-tool prior to the snippets are assigned using > '='. Therefore, you can't do this: > > Makefile.am: > DEFAULT_INCLUDES = > AM_CPPFLAGS = -DNO_XMALLOC > include Makefile.am.gnul

Re: [bug-gnulib] [patch] feature enhancement for gnulib-tool

2006-10-20 Thread Charles Wilson
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:08:56 +0200, "Bruno Haible" said: > Charles Wilson wrote: > > When you call gnulib-tool --import/--update, it autogenerates a > > Makefile.am for the library. Sometimes it is desirable to customize > > that Makefile's behavior -- but those customizations will be lost upon

Re: [bug-gnulib] [patch] feature enhancement for gnulib-tool

2006-10-20 Thread Bruno Haible
Hello Charles, Charles Wilson wrote: > When you call gnulib-tool --import/--update, it autogenerates a > Makefile.am for the library. Sometimes it is desirable to customize > that Makefile's behavior -- but those customizations will be lost upon > the next --update. Thanks for working on this

[patch] feature enhancement for gnulib-tool

2006-10-20 Thread Charles Wilson
When you call gnulib-tool --import/--update, it autogenerates a Makefile.am for the library. Sometimes it is desirable to customize that Makefile's behavior -- but those customizations will be lost upon the next --update. The attached patch is not complete; it needs more work and some feedbac