Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I omitted stdbool on the theory that packages that to assume C99 don't
> need to use the stdbool module, since stdbool.h comes with C99.
For what it's worth, this wasn't a package assuming c99. I think it
was a result of including something that autoscan
Dave Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> dirname.h includes stdbool.h but the dirname module is missing a
> Depends-on for it.
I omitted stdbool on the theory that packages that to assume C99 don't
need to use the stdbool module, since stdbool.h comes with C99.
However, this subject seems to reco
dirname.h includes stdbool.h but the dirname module is missing a
Depends-on for it.
___
bug-gnulib mailing list
bug-gnulib@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
