Eric Blake wrote:
> They are recommended by the GNU Coding Standards as an attribution that
> the code fits under the tiny change rule, and hence that checking for that
> contributor's copyright assignment when doing an audit is not necessary.
Ah. Thanks for explaining. The copy of the GCS where I
Hello Bruno,
* Bruno Haible wrote on Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 02:25:13PM CEST:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
> > That change also removed all "(tiny change)" annotations.
>
> What were these annotations meant to mean?
They are explained here:
http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/maintain.html#Legally-Significan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 10/10/2006 6:25 AM:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> That change also removed all "(tiny change)" annotations.
>
> What were these annotations meant to mean?
They are recommended by the GNU Coding Standards as an attribution that
Jim Meyering wrote:
> That change also removed all "(tiny change)" annotations.
What were these annotations meant to mean?
Bruno
Paul Eggert wrote:
> I merged all the gnulib ChangeLog files into one ChangeLog, at the
> top.
And I redid the line breaking, to fit in 80 columns (actually 79 columns
where possible).
Bruno
