Eric Blake wrote:
> I'm applying this as the obvious fix.
>
> 2006-09-25 Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * gnulib-tool (func_import, func_create_testdir): Fix typos in
> 2006-09-18 patch.
Thanks. It was more than a typo, actually a thinko :-(
Bruno
Eric Blake wrote:
> This is to be expected - POSIX states that $$ is special, and that in a
> subshell, it is not the pid of the current process, but the pid of the
> original process.
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html#tag_02_05_02
Thanks! I wasn't aware of
* Bruno Haible wrote on Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 05:20:14PM CEST:
>
> > I think it may be possible to shave off another good part, but the next
> > changes probably have a higher source code change to improvement ratio
> > (caching func_lookup_file results could help; or rewriting func_get_*
> > to wo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 9/18/2006 9:20 AM:
>> I think it may be possible to shave off another good part, but the next
>> changes probably have a higher source code change to improvement ratio
>> (caching func_lookup_file results could help; or rew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 9/18/2006 9:20 AM:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> Hmm, ok. But traditional shells execute this construct
>> while read foo
>> do
>> $whatever
>> done <$file
>>
>> in a subshell, too, for example Solaris 10 sh.
>
>
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hmm, ok. But traditional shells execute this construct
> while read foo
> do
> $whatever
> done <$file
>
> in a subshell, too, for example Solaris 10 sh.
Ouch. Looking at the variables, it indeed behaves like a subshell.
Looking at the process id, it does not..
