Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: coreutils FTS inclusion

2005-05-18 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 12:51 -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > There is also a problem with the 'intprops.h' dependency. > > When gnulib-tool is run, the file is included, but it doesn't seem to be > > listed as part of the generated Makefile.am, le

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: coreutils FTS inclusion

2005-05-18 Thread Paul Eggert
Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There is also a problem with the 'intprops.h' dependency. > When gnulib-tool is run, the file is included, but it doesn't seem to be > listed as part of the generated Makefile.am, leading to 'dist' trouble. I have removed this dependency; fts no

[bug-gnulib] Re: coreutils FTS inclusion

2005-05-18 Thread Jim Meyering
Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > There is also a problem with the 'intprops.h' dependency. > When gnulib-tool is run, the file is included, but it doesn't seem to be > listed as part of the generated Makefile.am, leading to 'dist' trouble. Thanks. I've fixed it: 2005-05-18

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: coreutils FTS inclusion

2005-05-18 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 12:25 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Another things is that including the fts module trigger a missing > > dependency: > > ../src/.libs/libprelude.so: undefined reference to `xalloc_die' > > That's because the hash module uses

[bug-gnulib] Re: coreutils FTS inclusion

2005-05-17 Thread Jim Meyering
Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>From a first look, the fts module file is lacking lstat, realloc and > malloc dependencies (which also would need to have their license changed > from GPL to LGPL). Thanks. I'll add lstat. It doesn't seem to require the malloc module, since there

[bug-gnulib] Re: coreutils FTS inclusion

2005-05-17 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 14:42 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: [...] > Thanks for diagnosing that. > I've confirmed that those modules are not needed, > so I'll remove those lines. Saw that the FTS module was checked in. Are you planing to do something regarding the license problem ? -- Yoann Vandoors

[bug-gnulib] Re: coreutils FTS inclusion

2005-05-17 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 10:47 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > > Saw that the FTS module was checked in. Are you planing to do something > > regarding the license problem ? > > Of course :) > As soon as that's resolved, I'll check in modules/fts.

[bug-gnulib] Re: coreutils FTS inclusion

2005-05-17 Thread Jim Meyering
Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > Saw that the FTS module was checked in. Are you planing to do something > regarding the license problem ? Of course :) As soon as that's resolved, I'll check in modules/fts. ___ bug-gnulib mailing l

[bug-gnulib] Re: coreutils FTS inclusion

2005-05-17 Thread Jim Meyering
Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another things is that including the fts module trigger a missing > dependency: > ../src/.libs/libprelude.so: undefined reference to `xalloc_die' That's because the hash module uses xalloc. You must tell gnulib-tool that you want to use xalloc-die,

[bug-gnulib] Re: coreutils FTS inclusion

2005-05-17 Thread Jim Meyering
Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... >> It will be LGPL, since it's based on the glibc one which is LGPL. ... > Well, there seem to be a few license problem with the dependencies: > cycle-check, dirfd, hash, unistd-safer and xalloc are marked as GPL > only, so the inclusion of FTS us

[bug-gnulib] Re: coreutils FTS inclusion

2005-05-17 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 10:36 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > >> It will be LGPL, since it's based on the glibc one which is LGPL. > ... > > Well, there seem to be a few license problem with the dependencies: > > cycle-check, dirfd, hash, unistd-sa

[bug-gnulib] Re: coreutils FTS inclusion

2005-05-17 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 11:27 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > >> The other files are not hidden :) > >> They're part of coreutils. > > > > I will try by using these. Note that coreutils contain no fts.m4. I will > > You'll find it in the CVS repos

[bug-gnulib] Re: coreutils FTS inclusion

2005-05-17 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 12:57 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>From a first look, the fts module file is lacking lstat, realloc and > > malloc dependencies (which also would need to have their license changed > > from GPL to LGPL). > > Thanks. I'll ad

[bug-gnulib] Re: coreutils FTS inclusion

2005-05-17 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 13:04 +0200, Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote: > On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 12:57 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > > Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>From a first look, the fts module file is lacking lstat, realloc and > > > malloc dependencies (which also would need to

[bug-gnulib] Re: coreutils FTS inclusion

2005-05-17 Thread Jim Meyering
Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 13:04 +0200, Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote: >> On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 12:57 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: >> > Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >>From a first look, the fts module file is lacking lstat, realloc and

[bug-gnulib] Re: coreutils FTS inclusion

2005-05-17 Thread Jim Meyering
Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... >> The other files are not hidden :) >> They're part of coreutils. > > I will try by using these. Note that coreutils contain no fts.m4. I will You'll find it in the CVS repository for the project on Savannah: savannah.gnu.org/projects/coreuti

[bug-gnulib] Re: coreutils FTS inclusion

2005-05-17 Thread Jim Meyering
Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Jim, > > I just wanted to know if it is finally planed that the coreutils FTS > module will be included in GnuLIB. Henry originally did his FTS module > for the Prelude project, and we needed this module to be LGPL. > > So my question is whether

[bug-gnulib] Re: coreutils FTS inclusion

2005-05-16 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 08:44 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > > > I just wanted to know if it is finally planed that the coreutils FTS > > module will be included in GnuLIB. Henry originally did his FTS module > > for the Prelude project, a