Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Section 7.1.4 of the C89 spec states, "The value of errno ... is never
> set to zero by any library function." I am assuming that getlogin_r and
> probably most other GNULIB functions should act like library functions
> when possible?
It sounds reasonabl
Bruno Haible wrote:
>Derek Price wrote:
>
>
>>This is what I installed.
>>
>>
>
>Note that lib/ and m4/ have ChangeLogs of their own. Only the top-level
>and modules/* modifications go into the top-level ChangeLog. Including
>the update of MODULES.html.sh (adding one line for each new module
Derek Price wrote:
> This is what I installed.
Note that lib/ and m4/ have ChangeLogs of their own. Only the top-level
and modules/* modifications go into the top-level ChangeLog. Including
the update of MODULES.html.sh (adding one line for each new module).
Three further remarks:
- In the inclu
Derek Price wrote:
> How about something like the attached patch to the modules/memcpy file?
That's a bit redundant. It's already mentioned in MODULES.html.
Bruno
___
bug-gnulib mailing list
bug-gnulib@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bu
Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Per your suggestion, Paul, I've attached a getlogin_r module for
> review. It compiles and works here as gl_GETLOGIN_R or
> gl_GETLOGIN_R_SUBSTITUTE.
That looks good to me. Can you please install it, along with
appropriate ChangeLog entries? I added yo
