On 10/12/2010 11:20 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
git-version-gen itself relies on the presence of .git in the
current directory. I've made a quick and dirty patch to it
here to also look in the parent directory... but surely there's
a nicer way to determine whether the current
Hallo Bruno,
Thanks again for the speedy and thoughtful feedback on this
patch series. I'm sorry that I won't have the time to actually
apply any of your good advice for at least a couple of weeks,
but whatever is still outstanding when I next have discretionary
hacking time, I'll apply, retest a
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> git-version-gen itself relies on the presence of .git in the
> current directory. I've made a quick and dirty patch to it
> here to also look in the parent directory... but surely there's
> a nicer way to determine whether the current directory is managed
> by git than thi
Might as well use the existing git-version-gen mechanism to
get git based unique version strings for libposix. However,
git-version-gen itself relies on the presence of .git in the
current directory. I've made a quick and dirty patch to it
here to also look in the parent directory... but surely t
