Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/11/2010 04:51 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> That's because futimens (AT_FDCWD, NULL) would fail with errno set to
>> EFAULT, rather than the expected value of EBADF.
>>
>> At first I was going to relax the test to allow "|| errno == EFAULT",
>> but what if EFAULT is not defin
On 10/11/2010 04:51 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
That's because futimens (AT_FDCWD, NULL) would fail with errno set to
EFAULT, rather than the expected value of EBADF.
At first I was going to relax the test to allow "|| errno == EFAULT",
but what if EFAULT is not defined? There's only one other use
ementation will
interpret things differently.
>From 0afab138f4aedb7eaab70957c164aa0e5eb01fce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:44:56 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] test-futimens: avoid unwarranted test failure on Solaris 5.11
* tests/test-futimens.h (test_futimens):
