Hi,
On Sat, 11 Nov 2023, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > In 480a59ba60 (*printf-posix: ISO C 23: Support size specifiers 'wN' and
> > 'wfN'., 2023-03-24), a major refactoring hides a bug in the conversion
> > of the code handling Windows' `%I64*` family of `printf()` formats:
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> In 480a59ba60 (*printf-posix: ISO C 23: Support size specifiers 'wN' and
> 'wfN'., 2023-03-24), a major refactoring hides a bug in the conversion
> of the code handling Windows' `%I64*` family of `printf()` formats:
> before the refactoring, the `64` part was skipped (a
In 480a59ba60 (*printf-posix: ISO C 23: Support size specifiers 'wN' and
'wfN'., 2023-03-24), a major refactoring hides a bug in the conversion
of the code handling Windows' `%I64*` family of `printf()` formats:
before the refactoring, the `64` part was skipped (as desired), but
afterwards that par
