Re: [PATCH] pipe-posix: new module

2010-12-10 Thread Bruno Haible
Eric Blake wrote: > testing I/O through the pipe is impossible without > either threading or spawning a child process, all of which seem rather > complex given how simple the module itself is. A partial test is better than none. In fact, we already have a test for the pipe2() function. It's easy t

Re: [PATCH] pipe-posix: new module

2010-12-10 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Eric, > since it is just a #define rather than a replacement function, it > fails the POSIX aspect of being able to pass a function pointer to > pipe around And it also fails the signature test in C++ mode: When I add these lines *** tests/test-unistd-c++.cc.orig Sat Dec 11 02:47:25 201

[PATCH] pipe-posix: new module

2010-12-10 Thread Eric Blake
* modules/pipe-posix: New file. * m4/unistd_h.m4 (gl_UNISTD_H_DEFAULTS): Set default. (gl_UNISTD_H): Check for declaration. * modules/unistd (Makefile.am): Substitute it. * lib/unistd.in.h (pipe): Provide it for mingw. * doc/posix-functions/pipe.texi (pipe): Update documentation. * MODULES.html.sh