Paul Eggert wrote:
> No, and thanks that looks good.
OK. Pushed.
On 2025-01-05 15:10, Bruno Haible wrote:
Any objections to fixing it like in the attached proposed patch?
No, and thanks that looks good.
Hi Paul,
Reviewing parse-datetime.y, I see that
* 6 invocations of dbg_fputs don't use _(), while the others do.
* The invocations of _() inside dbg_printf and dbg_fputs is
useless, because at this point in the code the argument is
not a string literal, thus 'xgettext' will not extract
I found this when updating GNU patch.
* lib/parse-datetime.y (dbg_herald): New static function.
(dbg_printf): Use it.
(dbg_fputs): New static function. All dbg_printf callers
changed to use it, if their formats contain no directives.
(parse_datetime_body): Call fputs instead of fprintf
if either w