Re: [PATCH] nstrftime documentation

2020-05-21 Thread Bruno Haible
Paul Eggert wrote: > > to gnulib, in a file doc/nstrftime.texi? > > And have coreutils.texi include that? Sure, that should work. I suppose > there'd be a new Gnulib package for the nstrftime documentation? It doesn't even need an extra Gnulib module. For 'parse-datetime', we have added the .tex

Re: [PATCH] nstrftime documentation

2020-05-21 Thread Paul Eggert
On 5/21/20 2:08 PM, Bruno Haible wrote: So, how about moving the sections [1] Time conversion specifiers Date conversion specifiers Literal conversion specifiers Padding and other flags to gnulib, in a file doc/nstrftime.texi? And have coreutils.texi include that? Sure, that should

Re: [PATCH] nstrftime documentation

2020-05-21 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Paul, > Given that the coreutils manual's 'date' section already documents the > nstrftime format, perhaps the least-work approach would be to change the > Gnulib nstrftime comments/documentation to point to the coreutils manual. Still, that would mean that someone who makes a change to nstr