Eric Blake wrote:
...
> But the mktempd script requires -p:
>
> d=`env -u TMPDIR mktemp -d -t -p "$destdir" "$template" 2>/dev/null` \
>
> and FreeBSD mktemp lacks that:
>
> usage: mktemp [-d] [-q] [-t prefix] [-u] templat ...
>mktemp [-d] [-q] [-u] -t prefix
>
> in other words, since the
On 12/02/2011 06:18 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 12/02/2011 01:06 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 12/02/2011 03:24 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> Eric Blake wrote:
When running a testsuite on FreeBSD, I saw a lot of:
>>>
>>> For the record, what version of FreeBSD was that?
>>> I see that at le
On 12/02/2011 01:06 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 12/02/2011 03:24 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Eric Blake wrote:
>>> When running a testsuite on FreeBSD, I saw a lot of:
>>>
>>
>> For the record, what version of FreeBSD was that?
>> I see that at least 9.0-BETA3 does have /usr/bin/mktemp.
>
> freebsd6
On 12/02/2011 03:24 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>> When running a testsuite on FreeBSD, I saw a lot of:
>>
>
> For the record, what version of FreeBSD was that?
> I see that at least 9.0-BETA3 does have /usr/bin/mktemp.
freebsd64 8.2-RELEASE
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com
Eric Blake wrote:
> When running a testsuite on FreeBSD, I saw a lot of:
>
> 1+ records in
> 0+1 records out
> 10 bytes transferred in 0.63 secs (158875 bytes/sec)
>
> literring the testsuite, and traced it to the fact that we
> were silencing one, but not the other, dd usage in our fallback.
>
When running a testsuite on FreeBSD, I saw a lot of:
1+ records in
0+1 records out
10 bytes transferred in 0.63 secs (158875 bytes/sec)
literring the testsuite, and traced it to the fact that we
were silencing one, but not the other, dd usage in our fallback.
* build-aux/mktempd (rand_bytes)
