On 01/20/2011 04:34 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> So far, I don't see a down-side to adding this line to maint.mk:
>
> check: public-submodule-commit
>
> Does anyone else?
Yes, but only minor:
> public-submodule-commit:
> - if test -d $(srcdir)/.git; then \
>
Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/20/2011 04:34 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> This is in preparation for hooking this rule to "check"
>> at least in coreutils. Today I was burned once again by
>> pushing a non-public submodule reference (coreutils).
>> The fact that this check is currently run only at relea
On 01/20/2011 04:34 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> This is in preparation for hooking this rule to "check"
> at least in coreutils. Today I was burned once again by
> pushing a non-public submodule reference (coreutils).
> The fact that this check is currently run only at release time
> is good, but ob
Jan 2011 11:50:53 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] maint.mk: improve the public-submodule-commit rule
* top/maint.mk (public-submodule-commit): Prefix with $(AM_V_GEN),
to suppress printing of its commands... unless V=1.
Add git submodule's --quiet option to suppress printing of e.g.,
"Enteri
