Paul Eggert wrote:
> I pushed these gnulib spelling fixes as obvious and trivial.
Thanks a lot!
While most of them were really typos, I didn't know that "verification"
doesn't have a plural form.
Bruno
Jim Meyering writes:
> It would be nice to have a batch spell-checker that we could run
> periodically.
There's codespell:
http://git.profusion.mobi/cgit.cgi/lucas/codespell/
I haven't used it.
--
Ben Pfaff
http://benpfaff.org
On 02/05/2012 11:47 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> What tool do you use for that?
It's a pretty awful script (please see below)
which I originally developed for Emacs.
It has many false positives, and the trick is to
be able to scan its output quickly looking for the real positives.
Perhaps someone som
Paul Eggert wrote:
> I pushed these gnulib spelling fixes as obvious and trivial.
> My fave was "Free Softward Foundation".
Thanks!
What tool do you use for that?
It would be nice to have a batch spell-checker that we could run
periodically.
I pushed these gnulib spelling fixes as obvious and trivial.
My fave was "Free Softward Foundation".
---
NEWS|4 ++--
build-aux/update-copyright |6 +++---
doc/gnulib.texi |4 ++--
doc/intprops.texi |4
