Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I think that miss some common
> use-cases for when ./bootstrap is used, including: 1) non-regular
> developers who we want to be able to build things as quickly as possible
> with no additional documentation and git clone + ./bootstrap +
> ./configure should work so they ca
Bruno Haible writes:
> Hi Simon and Collin,
>
>> > Could putting the following into bootstrap.conf be a method that
>> > we could recommend? Then developers can override it with
>> > GNULIB_TOOL_IMPL=sh ./bootstrap if they want.
>> >
>> > GNULIB_TOOL_IMPL=${GNULIB_TOOL_IMPL:-py}
>>
>> I'd like
Hi Simon and Collin,
> > Could putting the following into bootstrap.conf be a method that
> > we could recommend? Then developers can override it with
> > GNULIB_TOOL_IMPL=sh ./bootstrap if they want.
> >
> > GNULIB_TOOL_IMPL=${GNULIB_TOOL_IMPL:-py}
>
> I'd like to hear what Bruno thinks about
Hi Simon,
On 3/23/24 2:24 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Is there a way to opt-in inetutils to prefer python gnulib-tool, before
> gnulib as a whole changes its default behaviour? I think doing that
> will allow better testing of gnulib-tool.py in the wild until gnulib as
> a whole can change. Thi
(moving to bug-gnulib)
Collin Funk writes:
> On 3/22/24 2:18 PM, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> Upgrading inetutils to use gnulib-tool.py would be nice. As a start, I
>> bumped the gnulib submodule.
>
> Bruno and I are still working on it with a test suite. We want the
> file output and stdout outpu
