$ ./configure
...
Configure findings:
FFI:no (user requested: default)
readline: yes (user requested: default)
libsigsegv: no, consider installing GNU libsigsegv
Especially for packages with many dependencies or with many configuration
opportunities it would be
Bruno Haible writes:
> I like it. Even more I like the configure files that print a summary of the
> most important decisions or findings at the end of the configuration, thus
> giving an opportunity to the user to re-configure with different --with or
> --enable options. (Given the size of the c
Pádraig Brady wrote:
...
> Anyway I'll check in the attached patch to coreutils, and would
> appreciate if someone could apply the gnulib one.
Done. Thanks.
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> configure: WARNING: libacl development library was not found or not
>> usable.
>> configure: WARNING: GNU coreutils will be built without ACL support.
>> configure: WARNING: libselinux was found but selinux/selinux.h is
>> missing.
>>
Bruno Haible writes:
> I like it. Even more I like the configure files that print a summary of the
> most important decisions or findings at the end of the configuration, thus
> giving an opportunity to the user to re-configure with different --with or
> --enable options. (Given the size of the c
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> configure: WARNING: libacl development library was not found or not
> usable.
> configure: WARNING: GNU coreutils will be built without ACL support.
> configure: WARNING: libselinux was found but selinux/selinux.h is missing.
> configure: WARNING: GNU coreuti
Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Jim Meyering writes:
>
>> I figured that making it easier for the vast majority
>> compensates for being less than perfectly generic.
>> I suspect that targeting apt-based and yum-based distros
>> would cover well over 80% of our audience.
>
> There are also a lot of zypper
Jim Meyering writes:
> I figured that making it easier for the vast majority
> compensates for being less than perfectly generic.
> I suspect that targeting apt-based and yum-based distros
> would cover well over 80% of our audience.
There are also a lot of zypper-based systems. :-)
Andreas.
-
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>>
>> What do you think about suggesting with each how to install
>> the missing package, e.g.,
>>
>> You can install the required libgmp.* files
>> via "yum install gmp-devel" on a fedora-based system,
>> or "apt-get install gmp-devel" on a
Jim Meyering wrote:
>
> What do you think about suggesting with each how to install
> the missing package, e.g.,
>
> You can install the required libgmp.* files
> via "yum install gmp-devel" on a fedora-based system,
> or "apt-get install gmp-devel" on a debian-based system.
>
> The
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> I was going to mention some optional packages for coreutils in README-prereq
>
> libselinux-devel
> libcap-devel
> libattr-devel
> gmp-devel
> libacl-devel
>
> However these names are linux specific and probably even fedora specific,
> so what would be bet
I was going to mention some optional packages for coreutils in README-prereq
libselinux-devel
libcap-devel
libattr-devel
gmp-devel
libacl-devel
However these names are linux specific and probably even fedora specific,
so what would be better I think is for configure to give ap
12 matches
Mail list logo
