[PATCH] inttostr.c: suppress a warning

2009-01-18 Thread Jim Meyering
FYI, I've pushed this a few days ago. >From 19b4d0fb6a9dff94b74fc948880da2f0c7ddd3e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:36:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] inttostr.c: suppress a warning * lib/inttostr.c: Use #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wtype-limi

Re: [PATCH] inttostr.c: suppress a warning

2009-01-12 Thread Jim Meyering
shed the following change: >From 19b4d0fb6a9dff94b74fc948880da2f0c7ddd3e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:36:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] inttostr.c: suppress a warning * lib/inttostr.c: Use #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wtype-limits" to ignore &q

Re: [PATCH] inttostr.c: suppress a warning

2008-12-23 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Jim, > * lib/inttostr.c: Use #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wtype-limits" Personally I find the -Wtype-limits warnings pointless[1], because the very purpose of writing char c = ...; if (c >= 0 && c <= 0x7f) is to avoid #ifdef in functions: char c = ...; if (true

[PATCH] inttostr.c: suppress a warning

2008-12-23 Thread Jim Meyering
Hi Paul, Any objection to this change? >From b6459ede3601010abe11e5e2b766e010e1efce5d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:36:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] inttostr.c: suppress a warning * lib/inttostr.c: Use #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wtype-limits&qu