Re: [PATCH] hash: deprecate poorly-named hash_insert0: use hash_insert_if_absent

Simon Josefsson wrote: > FYI, I applied a trivial fix to remove references to the old insert0 > name. Thanks, Simon!

Re: [PATCH] hash: deprecate poorly-named hash_insert0: use hash_insert_if_absent

FYI, I applied a trivial fix to remove references to the old insert0 name. /Simon

Re: [PATCH] hash: deprecate poorly-named hash_insert0: use hash_insert_if_absent

.c, >> and I've adjusted that. >> >> While I've deprecated the offending function, hash_insert0, given that >> there are no other users, removing it altogether might be better. >> Opinions? > ... I went ahead and pushed it. Opinions still welcome, of cou

Re: [PATCH] hash: deprecate poorly-named hash_insert0: use hash_insert_if_absent

t; While I've deprecated the offending function, hash_insert0, given that > there are no other users, removing it altogether might be better. > Opinions? ... > Subject: [PATCH] hash: deprecate poorly-named hash_insert0: use > hash_insert_if_absent Actually I updated NEWS, but had not

[PATCH] hash: deprecate poorly-named hash_insert0: use hash_insert_if_absent

n, hash_insert0, given that there are no other users, removing it altogether might be better. Opinions? >From 74153190cd1d0b89d05c4a2d4f89f78e103fc37f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:09:16 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] hash: deprecate poorly-named hash_insert0: use has