Re: [PATCH] gendocs: Change maintainer.

2014-12-18 Thread Ludovic Courtès
k...@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) skribis: > I feel the need to clarify that I did not "suggest" it. My exact words > were "that would be fine". In other words, I was willing for it to > happen, since although I find your proposed CSS changes quite wrong, I > didn't (and don't) want to debate it

Re: [PATCH] gendocs: Change maintainer.

2014-12-17 Thread Karl Berry
as Karl suggested at I feel the need to clarify that I did not "suggest" it. My exact words were "that would be fine". In other words, I was willing for it to happen, since although I find your proposed CSS changes quite wrong, I didn't (and don't) want to debate it and don't feel it's my pl

Re: [PATCH] gendocs: Change maintainer.

2014-12-17 Thread Paul Eggert
On 12/17/2014 08:49 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: (I’m of course happy if someone else wants to add their name.) When I feel that way (which is the typical case) I generally put "All" under "Maintainer:". Thanks for taking it on, anyway.

[PATCH] gendocs: Change maintainer.

2014-12-17 Thread Ludovic Courtès
r name.) Thanks, Ludo’. From 23458756865319cc5e5ac23a3a8da86286c5e638 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ludovic=20Court=C3=A8s?= Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:45:27 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] gendocs: Change maintainer. --- modules/gendocs | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)