Re: [PATCH] dirname: move m4/dos.m4 functionality into lib/dosname.h

2011-02-25 Thread Paul Eggert
On 02/25/2011 12:32 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: You might want to note somewhere that existing projects (e.g., some of mine) may want to #include "dosname.h" instead of "dirname.h", if that was the case. OK, I created a NEWS entry that mentions that, and also the symbols like ISSLASH and FILE_SYSTE

Re: [PATCH] dirname: move m4/dos.m4 functionality into lib/dosname.h

2011-02-25 Thread Jim Meyering
Paul Eggert wrote: > OK, here's that promised patch for review. I've tested it with Emacs > and with coreutils, but I haven't pushed it into gnulib yet. ... > + dirname: move m4/dos.m4 functionality into lib/dosname.h > + > + m4/dos.m4 needs to go. It laboriously invokes the C compiler, a

[PATCH] dirname: move m4/dos.m4 functionality into lib/dosname.h

2011-02-25 Thread Paul Eggert
OK, here's that promised patch for review. I've tested it with Emacs and with coreutils, but I haven't pushed it into gnulib yet. --- ChangeLog| 35 lib/at-func.c|2 +- lib/at-func2.c |2 +- lib/dirname.h| 30 +---