Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > All the kernel routines were seen to be significantly slower
> > with these relatively recent components on an i3-2310M system:
> > kernel-4.10.6-200.fc25.x86_64
> > openssl-1.0.2m-1.fc25.x86_64
> > sha1 was nearly twice as slow in the kernel for example.
>
> Assaf Gor
On 24/06/18 12:31, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> Assaf Gordon has just detailed more reasons why af_alg
>> should not be enabled by default at:
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2018-06/msg00034.html
>
> Thanks for the pointer. I was meaning to disable af_alg by defaul
Pádraig Brady wrote:
Assaf Gordon has just detailed more reasons why af_alg
should not be enabled by default at:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2018-06/msg00034.html
Thanks for the pointer. I was meaning to disable af_alg by default myself, as
the arguments against it were pretty
On 24/06/18 02:24, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> All the kernel routines were seen to be significantly slower
> with these relatively recent components on an i3-2310M system:
> kernel-4.10.6-200.fc25.x86_64
> openssl-1.0.2m-1.fc25.x86_64
> sha1 was nearly twice as slow in the kernel for example.
Assa
All the kernel routines were seen to be significantly slower
with these relatively recent components on an i3-2310M system:
kernel-4.10.6-200.fc25.x86_64
openssl-1.0.2m-1.fc25.x86_64
sha1 was nearly twice as slow in the kernel for example.
* m4/af_alg.m4: Require --with-linux-crypto to enable.
