Re: [PATCH] Really build without selinux when library is missing.

2013-10-22 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 10/22/2013 07:27 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > On 10/21/2013 04:25 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> Does this more general fix work for you? >> >> diff --git a/m4/selinux-selinux-h.m4 b/m4/selinux-selinux-h.m4 >> index 17cccff..eb005fc 100644 >> --- a/m4/selinux-selinux-h.m4 >> +++ b/m4/selinux-

Re: [PATCH] Really build without selinux when library is missing.

2013-10-21 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 10/21/2013 04:25 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 10/21/2013 02:41 PM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: >> * m4/selinux-selinux-h.m4: When the selinux library is missing, really >> continue without selinux, as already told in the warning message. >> --- a/m4/selinux-selinux-h.m4 >> +++ b/m4/selinux-

Re: [PATCH] Really build without selinux when library is missing.

2013-10-21 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 10/21/2013 02:41 PM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > * m4/selinux-selinux-h.m4: When the selinux library is missing, really > continue without selinux, as already told in the warning message. > > This is necessary for when the 64bit selinux development package is > installed only, but the packag

[PATCH] Really build without selinux when library is missing.

2013-10-21 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
* m4/selinux-selinux-h.m4: When the selinux library is missing, really continue without selinux, as already told in the warning message. This is necessary for when the 64bit selinux development package is installed only, but the package (tar-1.27 fex) is built as 32bit, causing the header files to