Le vendredi 08 novembre 2013 à 09:06 -0700, Eric Blake a écrit :
> On 11/08/2013 08:31 AM, Benjamin Cama wrote:
> > My goal is to avoid building any library at all when I am only using
> > gnulib for some utils like gitlog-to-changelog or git-version-gen
> > (furthermore when I don't even check for
On 11/08/2013 08:31 AM, Benjamin Cama wrote:
> My goal is to avoid building any library at all when I am only using
> gnulib for some utils like gitlog-to-changelog or git-version-gen
> (furthermore when I don't even check for a compiler at all; my project
> is shell scripting only).
GNU Autoconf
Hi Eric,
Le vendredi 08 novembre 2013 à 08:11 -0700, Eric Blake a écrit :
> On 11/07/2013 11:14 AM, Benjamin Cama wrote:
> > diff --git a/gnulib-tool b/gnulib-tool
> > index 669931c..55fbee3 100755
> > --- a/gnulib-tool
> > +++ b/gnulib-tool
> > @@ -2954,7 +2954,7 @@ ba
> > fi
> >done
> >
On 11/08/2013 08:11 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>># Add the dummy module, to make sure the library will be non-empty.
>> - if test -z "$have_lib_SOURCES"; then
>> + if test -n "$have_lib_SOURCES"; then
>> if func_acceptable "dummy"; then
>>func_append modules " dummy"
>
> Huh? The ex
On 11/07/2013 11:14 AM, Benjamin Cama wrote:
> The test was inverted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Cama
> ---
> gnulib-tool |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnulib-tool b/gnulib-tool
> index 669931c..55fbee3 100755
> --- a/gnulib-tool
> +++ b/gnulib-
The test was inverted.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Cama
---
gnulib-tool |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnulib-tool b/gnulib-tool
index 669931c..55fbee3 100755
--- a/gnulib-tool
+++ b/gnulib-tool
@@ -2954,7 +2954,7 @@ ba
fi
done
# Add the dummy mo
