On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> I noticed that nanosleep() on 64 bit, "only" supports 292 years,
> rather than the full potential 292 billion years with 64 bit time_t, due to:
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/linux/time.h?id=refs/tags/v3.16#
On Tue, 5 Aug 2014, Paul Eggert wrote:
> [CC'ing Thomas Gleixner, who maintains the Linux kernel's POSIX clocks and
> timers. Thomas, this thread started at
> <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2014-08/msg5.html>.]
>
> Pádraig Brady wrote:
>
