"Richard Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 1/4/07, Richard Sandiford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> it sounds like that would
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> it sounds like that would eliminate most of the problem. Certainly,
>> making -INT_MIN evaluate to INT_MIN, when expressed like that, is an
>> easy thing to do; that's just a guarantee about constant folding.
>
