On Tue, May 10, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2005, Paul Eggert wrote:
>
[...]
> > But I still don't get why the change is needed. It sounds like you're
> > assuming Solaris 11 getopt might get fixed? But even in that case,
> > the current co
opt gets fixed? In that case perhaps we should wait for Solaris 11
> and test it before installing this patch, as it's more likely to cause
> a bug than to fix one.
Well, it might still fail on other OSes, that also do not use GNU getopt.
They do probably also not have the getopt_clip. I
t;+" bug, just as valid as a means of selecting the GNU
> getopt() over the system one, was sufficient to avoid encountering any
> other bugs in the Solaris getopt().
I agree with you.
(mk)
--
Matthias Kurz; Fuldastr. 3; D-28199 Bremen; VOICE +49 421 53 600 47
>> Im prämoto
opt would accept an
option "-+" would just be an ugly side effect. But who knows, what effects
the setting of optint to 1 has on other platforms, where cvs always worked.
I did not want to think that much, so i said from the beginning on "just
use the GNU implementation everywhe
ggers" the problem.
> Matthias, would you mind testing this version out? If you could send me
> your config.log when you are done building, that would be helpful as well.
Yes, i'm going to test this asap.
(mk)
--
Matthias Kurz; Fuldastr. 3; D-28199 Brem
> 2005-05-05 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * lib/getopt.m4 (gl_GETOPT): Check for Solaris 10 getopt, and
> avoid needless checks.
Yes, this also works for me.
Thanks
(mk)
--
Matthias Kurz; Fuldastr. 3; D-28199 Bremen; VOICE +49 421 53 600 47
>&
