Bruno Haible wrote:
> It could be that the buffer that is too small is this 'buf' here, not
> something in glibc. Does the buffer overflow persist if you increase
> its size from 100 to 100, and/or if you use asprintf instead of sprintf?
Size of 1 seems to work. Size of 1000 doesn't. Usin
Bruno Haible wrote:
> This configure test and how glibc should handle printing of random bitpatterns
> was subject of a bug report
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4586
> and a lengthy discussion. The bug was fixed by Jakub Jelinek in July 2007;
> the fix should be contained in g
