Re: parse-datetime bug on NetBSD 10.0

2025-06-09 Thread Collin Funk
Hi Paul, Paul Eggert writes: > On 2025-06-08 17:39, Collin Funk wrote: >> Posting on bug-gnulib since this test failure seems to be caused by >> parse-datetime despite being caught by tests/date/date-debug.sh in >> Coreutils. > > I installed the attached patch to Gnulib, along with a minor testc

Silence 'time-stamp' warnings with bleeding-edge Emacs.

2025-06-09 Thread Collin Funk
I wanted to make a change to the bootstrap script but every time I saved the file Emacs would open a new window with an annoying warning. This is because of the following change documented in Emac's etc/NEWS: *** Some historical 'time-stamp' conversions now warn. 'time-stamp-pattern' and '

Re: OpenPGP keys

2025-06-09 Thread Richard Stallman
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] Perhaps it would be wise for those individuals inerested in this to have a discussion

Re: MinGW-w64 fenv changes.

2025-06-09 Thread Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list
Hi Collin, > > already did. How far did you get on this topic? > > I had a look a few weekends ago, but was not able to get it working. > Then forgot about it... Sorry, I do not have much done for you. Nothing to be sorry about. It's OK that you have different priorities. > +# if defined _MSC_V

Re: MinGW-w64 fenv changes.

2025-06-09 Thread Collin Funk
Hi Bruno, Bruno Haible writes: > On the GitHub CI machines, I now see compilation failures on mingw: > [...] > This means that the mingw people made a release with that change included, > and it is active in the GitHub CI environments. > > I want to get this fixed ASAP, but I don't want to dupli

Re: clang-cl: undeclared library function 'sprintf'

2025-06-09 Thread Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list
Kirill Makurin wrote: > This is the only issue I have encountered using clang-cl.exe. Everything else > works just fine. > > Actually, I tried to rebuild everything from scratch with clang-cl.exe and > noticed that iconv-2.dll, when built with clang-cl exports sprintf symbol There's no reason w

Re: clang-cl: undeclared library function 'sprintf'

2025-06-09 Thread Kirill Makurin
Other than different tools and a few compiler/linker flags, everything is the same as with MSVC. My *build script* takes care of setting variables like INCLUDE, LIB and PATH. This is the only issue I have encountered using clang-cl.exe. Everything else works just fine. Actually, I tried to reb

Re: clang-cl: undeclared library function 'sprintf'

2025-06-09 Thread Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list
Hi Kirill, > As part of my attempts to build some GNU packages with MSVC tools, I also > tried to build them with LLVM tools which can be installed with Visual Studio > (clang-cl.exe and lld-link.exe). > > When compiling source files lib/strerror.c and lib/vasnprintf.c (and possibly > some oth

clang-cl: undeclared library function 'sprintf'

2025-06-09 Thread Kirill Makurin
Hello, As part of my attempts to build some GNU packages with MSVC tools, I also tried to build them with LLVM tools which can be installed with Visual Studio (clang-cl.exe and lld-link.exe). When compiling source files lib/strerror.c and lib/vasnprintf.c (and possibly some other) the followin

Re: MinGW-w64 fenv changes.

2025-06-09 Thread Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list
Hi Collin, you wrote on 2025-04-25: > > But that mingw change is likely to not work at all. Because gcc can > > emit instructions that use the old i386/387 unit: > > (a) When the program uses 'long double' values, > > (b) When the option -mfpmath=387 is used, cf. > > https://gcc.gnu.org/

file-has-acl tests: Avoid test failure on Cygwin

2025-06-09 Thread Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list
About 3 days ago, the test-file-has-acl-2.sh started failing on Cygwin in the GitHub CI. Both on Cygwin 3.3.6 and the current 3.6.x. In this build from 3 days ago the test still succeeded: https://github.com/gnu-gettext/ci-check/actions/runs/15493719484 But nothing changed in Gnulib regarding ACLs

Re: parse-datetime bug on NetBSD 10.0

2025-06-09 Thread Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list
Collin Funk wrote: > > This is a NetBSD 10.0/arm64 machine. What about NetBSD 10.0/x86_64? > ... > I don't think this is needed since I think this has already been > confirmed to fail on NetBSD 10.0/x86_64 from your CI. There is a patch > that is applied marking it XFAIL on that platform [1]. Ah,