Hi Collin,
> This reminds me. I recently found out IBM allows you to request access
> to z/OS to "Develop and test open source on z/OS" or "Set up an open
> source CI/CD pipeline on z/OS" [1].
There's also a similar option to request access to Linux/s390x hardware [4].
> I have no clue who uses
Paul Eggert wrote:
> > Does Solaris cc of
> > version 0x5150 or newer really support statement-expressions?
>
> Yes it does[1]. Thanks for reporting the ChangeLog mistake; I installed
> the attached.
>
> [1]: https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E77782_01/html/E77792/gqexw.html#OSGCCgqexp
Thanks!
On 2025-05-07 14:31, Bruno Haible wrote:
-#if defined __GNUC__ || defined __clang__
-# if ! (2 < __GNUC__ + (8 <= __GNUC_MINOR__) || defined __clang__ \
-|| 0x5150 <= __SUNPRO_C)
+#if (defined __GNUC__ || defined __clang__ \
+ || (defined __SUNPRO_C && 0x5150 <= __SUNPRO_C))
+# if def
Hi Bruno,
Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list writes:
> + __ZOS__\
> + __zOS__\
This reminds me. I recently found out IBM allows you to request access
to z/OS to "Develop and test open source on z/OS" or "Set up an open
source CI/CD pipeline on z/OS" [1]. I would n
Collin Funk wrote:
> If we were to force code formatting conventions I would rather use
> something comprehensive like clang-format. But I dislike that idea
> anyways because unless every contributor uses the same version (very
> unlikely), it leads to useless diff chunks due to formatter
> disagre
Hi Bruno,
Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list writes:
> Apparently the gnulib indentation conventions, even of the modules owned
> by Jim and Eric, have deviated from the cppi conventions.
You and Paul agreed to remove the .cppi-disable file last year [1] [2].
Since no one else objected the
Bruno Haible writes:
> We had similar mistakes with __clang_major__ already. Sounds like
> a general syntax-check rule would help.
Thanks! Your commits proved this syntax-check was a good idea.
Collin
Paul Eggert wrote:
> Simplify the logic for __extension__.
> ...
> @@ -329,9 +331,9 @@ extern int obstack_exit_failure;
>
> #define obstack_memory_used(h) _obstack_memory_used (h)
>
> -#if defined __GNUC__ || defined __clang__
> -# if ! (2 < __GNUC__ + (8 <= __GNUC_MINOR__) || defined __clang_
---
lib/obstack.in.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/obstack.in.h b/lib/obstack.in.h
index 4b133c32cc..698b6b37a7 100644
--- a/lib/obstack.in.h
+++ b/lib/obstack.in.h
@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ extern int obstack_exit_failure;
(((_OBSTACK_CPTR) (h)->chunk < (OB
* lib/obstack.in.h (__attribute_noreturn__, __extension__):
Be more careful about checking whether a macro is defined before
using it, as some compilers complain otherwise.
Simplify the logic for __extension__.
---
ChangeLog| 8
lib/obstack.in.h | 16 +---
2 files cha
* lib/obstack.in.h (_OBSTACK_CPTR): New macro.
(obstack_free): Use it instead of comparing pointers directly,
when the pointers might not point into the same object.
---
ChangeLog| 5 +
lib/obstack.in.h | 17 ++---
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --
Running "make sc_check_copyright" produces this table:
Module LicenseFile License File name
= = =
GPL LGPLv2+ lib/hash-triple.h
LGPL LGPLv3+ or GPLv2+ lib/str-kmp.h
LGPLv2+ ?
To catch typos in predefined C macros, here are three patches.
2025-05-07 Bruno Haible
Add syntax-check rule against CPU predef misspellings.
* lib/getloadavg.c: Test __alpha, not __alpha__.
* tests/test-snan-2.c: Likewise.
* m4/exponentd.m4: Test __arm__, not
These three syntax-check rules fail:
$ make sc_maint
make -s srcdir=. gnulib_dir=. _build-aux=build-aux \
-f cfg.mk -f maint.mk syntax-check
make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'syntax-check'. Stop.
make: *** [Makefile:79: sc_maint] Error 2
Seeing that cfg.mk has not been changed in 9 y
After updating the list of _GL_ATTRIBUTE* macros in the Makefile, these
failures are seen:
File lib/areadlink.h lacks a config.h reminder. Needed for:
_GL_ATTRIBUTE_DEALLOC_FREE
File lib/crc.h lacks a config.h reminder. Needed for: _GL_ATTRIBUTE_PURE
File lib/crc-x86_64.h lacks a config.h reminde
Some of the existing syntax-check rules have apparently not been exercised
in a long time. This patch fixes one of them.
2025-05-07 Bruno Haible
Fix "make sc_prohibit_leading_TABs" failures.
* Makefile (exclude_file_name_regexp--sc_prohibit_leading_TABs): New
variable.
This patch refactors one of the syntax-check rules.
2025-05-07 Bruno Haible
Tidy "make sc_prohibit_AC_LIBOBJ_in_m4" check.
* Makefile (sc_prohibit_AC_LIBOBJ_in_m4): Don't hide the rule commands.
(allow_AC_LIBOBJ): Remove exceptions that are no longer needed.
diff --gi
* lib/obstack.in.h (obstack_free) [!__GNUC__]:
Omit an unnecessary pair of parentheses that are
also omitted in glibc.
---
lib/obstack.in.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/obstack.in.h b/lib/obstack.in.h
index 174cab9d0a..e361dc67ac 100644
--- a/lib/obstack.
It's better to show the Makefile commands being executed, than to hide them.
Transparency rules.
2025-05-07 Bruno Haible
Fix "make sc_prohibit_sc_omitted_at" failure.
* Makefile (sc_prohibit_sc_omitted_at): Don't apply to this Makefile.
(sc_*): Don't hide the rule comm
2025-05-07 Bruno Haible
Fix "make sc_prefer_ac_check_funcs_once" failure.
* Makefile (exclude_file_name_regexp--sc_prefer_ac_check_funcs_once):
New variable.
(sc_prefer_ac_check_funcs_once): Use it.
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 5fcc02510a..06ecc5d7c1 1
20 matches
Mail list logo
