Eric Blake wrote:
> - https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1633
> The bug mentions both memrchr() and wmemrchr() as possible candidates
> for standardization, but the Austin Group would rather standardize
> only memrchr() (can anyone even think of software where a proposed
> wmemrchr() would be
On 2024-06-10 11:19, Eric Blake wrote:
(can anyone even think of software where a proposed
wmemrchr() would be useful?)
I don't know of any.
By coincidence I just sent to this list a similar question about the
utility of wcsftime_l, which POSIX hasn't bothered to standardize. I've
never full
Eric Blake writes:
> wants to change requirements for isatty() and friends to be required
> to set errno on failure (right now, there is no obvious way to tell,
> using only the standard, if a failure even happened); but the Austin
> Group would like a wider sampling of what existing libc
> imple
Hello glibc and gnulib folks,
This email is somewhat of a grab bag of topics, all related to open
bugs on the Austin Group bug tracker for issues in POSIX that will
need some attention once the upcoming Issue 8 release of POSIX is
stabilized. If you would like to reply on a particular topic direc
Collin Funk summarized:
> Hi Yuqi,
>
> Yuqi Guo writes:
>
> > Hello friends, do you have any idea about this?
>
> Sorry, I forgot to respond. I'm moving this to bug-gnulib@gnu.org. I
> don't know enough about docker but perhaps someone else can help.
>
> The original report [1]:
>
> > File:
>
Hi Yuqi,
Yuqi Guo writes:
> Hello friends, do you have any idea about this?
Sorry, I forgot to respond. I'm moving this to bug-gnulib@gnu.org. I
don't know enough about docker but perhaps someone else can help.
The original report [1]:
> File:
>
>gnulib-tests/test-localeconv.c
>
> Code:
>
