[PATCH] gnulib-tool.py: Follow gnulib-tool changes, part 27.

2024-02-22 Thread Collin Funk
Hello, here is a patch implementing the --gnu-make option for gnulib-tool.py. Sorry in advance for the long ChangeLong entry. It makes it look like I did work than I actually did :). All of these commits were grouped together and were similar so I felt like it didn't make too much sense to handle t

Re: [PATCH] gnulib-tool.py: Follow gnulib-tool changes, part 26.

2024-02-22 Thread Bruno Haible
Collin Funk wrote: > For this change gnulib-tool had to be updated to emit an > empty assignment of EXTRA_PROGRAMS at the top of $test_dir/Makefile.am. > This prevents Automake from warning about it not being previously set. > > This change is trivial but here is a test case just to confirm. Than

[PATCH] gnulib-tool.py: Follow gnulib-tool changes, part 26.

2024-02-22 Thread Collin Funk
This patch syncs gnulib-tool.py with changes made to gnulib-tool to accommodate changes made to the verify-tests module. It seems that this module caused issues when running in parallel (i.e. "make -j16 check"). The solution to this involved using the EXTRA_PROGRAMS Automake variable. For this chan

Re: [PATCH] gnulib-tool.py: Improve output of testdir Makefile.am.

2024-02-22 Thread Collin Funk
On 2/22/24 8:53 AM, Bruno Haible wrote: > I added the part number, since it gives us a certain feeling of how far we > have gotten along. Also, I copy&pasted the date+author line from > the ChangeLog; the 'git log' contains the same data with slightly different > formatting. Sounds good to me. I'l

gperf dependency not documented

2024-02-22 Thread Gavin Smith
The DEPENDENCIES file in gnulib states a module that depends on the gperf program: * GNU gperf 3.0.1 or newer. + 3.0.1 or newer is mandatory, but 3.1 or newer is recommended. Needed if you use the 'iconv_open' module. However, it is not the only module that uses this program. gperf is also

Re: [PATCH] gnulib-tool.py: Improve output of testdir Makefile.am.

2024-02-22 Thread Bruno Haible
Collin Funk wrote: > Okay, here is a patch to make sure I am understanding correctly. Thanks, applied! > Thanks > for the help. The GNU ChangeLog stuff is new too me. I left the commit > message without a part number. I wasn't sure if you wanted to continue > them/restart since all of them are yo