On 2024-01-02 08:05, Karl Berry wrote:
Looks like the pragmas recently added to lib/regex.c have not been
installed upstream.
Actually it's the other way around, so things are good now.
I recently removed those pragmas from Gnulib, not realizing the file was
synced from glibc. You autoupdated
Looks like the pragmas recently added to lib/regex.c have not been
installed upstream. I did the sync from libc anyway ... -k
*** lib/regex.c Sun Dec 31 00:26:03 2023
--- /tmp/gnulib.srclist/regex.c Tue Jan 2 00:26:37 2024
***
*** 1,4
/* Extended regular expression matching and
Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> > Example code:
> >
> > #include
> > #include
> >
> > int main()
> > {
> > int value = strverscmp("UNKNOWN", "2.2.0");
> > printf("%d\n", value);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > Under glibc value "35" is printed (positive), under musl value "-1" is
> > printed (neg
On 1/2/24 01:58, Paul Eggert wrote:
On 2024-01-01 16:08, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
That commit broke the 'update-copyright' tests, because the test script
got messed up.
Thanks for reporting that. Turing would have been amused by
update-copyright modifying its own test, and then failing the modi
