On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 11:14 PM Jim Meyering wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2023, 22:54 Bruno Haible wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> > We've seen gnulib's new strtoll and strtoull tests for 0x and 0b failing
>> > on too many systems
>>
>> Can you please name one (or some of) these systems? So that I can
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023, 22:54 Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> > We've seen gnulib's new strtoll and strtoull tests for 0x and 0b failing
> > on too many systems
>
> Can you please name one (or some of) these systems? So that I can
> reproduce the problem. And, if you have it readily available,
>
Hi Jim,
> We've seen gnulib's new strtoll and strtoull tests for 0x and 0b failing
> on too many systems
Can you please name one (or some of) these systems? So that I can
reproduce the problem. And, if you have it readily available,
you can also attach a test-suite.log file, please?
Thanks.
Bru
Hi.
I like to use the revived PCC to compile gawk every once in a while.
This has stopped working.
Steps to reproduce:
git clone https://github.com/arnoldrobbins/pcc-revived.git
cd pcc-revived
git checkout ubuntu-18
./make-tmp.sh
/tmp/pcc/bin will have the execut
We've seen gnulib's new strtoll and strtoull tests for 0x and 0b failing
on too many systems, so I've just disabled them for grep, to avoid the
noise of failure reports. Also, this would block the process by which
we build release tarballs on e.g., Fedora 38.
>From 2ea921979769dc49865931f82f5e1d75
