Re: _FILE_OFFSET_BITS problem on Solaris 10 due to new stdbool.h handling

2023-01-22 Thread Paul Eggert
On 1/22/23 02:39, Bruno Haible wrote: Thanks. I reproduce it on Solaris 10, 32-bit mode, with cc but not with gcc: Yes, I think it may depend on GCC version. I observed it with gcc (GCC) 3.4.3 (csl-sol210-3_4-branch+sol_rpath) which is shipped with Solaris 10 sparc.

Android status

2023-01-22 Thread Bruno Haible
On Android, a testdir of all of Gnulib now compiles fine. The conflicts with libc.so are resolved. The only failing tests at this point are test-getloadavg test-login_tty test-nstrftime So, it's time to update the documentation. 2023-01-22 Bruno Haible doc: Update list of targe

Re: _FILE_OFFSET_BITS problem on Solaris 10 due to new stdbool.h handling

2023-01-22 Thread Bruno Haible
Paul Eggert wrote: > I ran into a problem on Solaris 10 gcc Thanks. I reproduce it on Solaris 10, 32-bit mode, with cc but not with gcc: cc -D_STDC_C99= -O -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../gllib -I.. -DGNULIB_STRICT_CHECKING=1 -I/home/haible/prefix-x86/include -D_REENTRANT -g -c -o stackvma.o .

Re: transition periods

2023-01-22 Thread Bruno Haible
Paul Eggert wrote: > if I see the warning I do the same thing that I > do if I see the error from the missing #include, so there's not much > point in having a transition period with the warning. I see a value for the transition period in three cases: 1) > Things can be different the transition