On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 11:19:22 PM CET Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> GNU findutils got a bug report for a failing test in the testsuite [1].
> It turned out that the calling environment had the current directory '.'
> in PATH. This triggered a warning in `find -execdir ...` and therefore
> made
On 11/23/21 14:19, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
Of course, the findutils tests could (and probably will) remove '.' from PATH,
but I wonder if this should or should not be done for other packages via a
change
in 'tests/init.sh' as well?
Sounds good to me.
It might also help to sanitize other sensi
GNU findutils got a bug report for a failing test in the testsuite [1].
It turned out that the calling environment had the current directory '.'
in PATH. This triggered a warning in `find -execdir ...` and therefore
made some tests fail.
[1] https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-findutils/2021-11/msg4.
Hi. This may mostly be for Bruno, but I believe it is more relevent to
gnulib than gettext, even though it is gettext-related, and maybe others
on this list can provide feedback too.
I got a bug report that suggested using AM_GNU_GETTEXT_REQUIRE_VERSION:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
CC-ing Vladimir...
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 02:34:25PM -0500, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Paul Eggert writes:
>
> > On 10/28/21 12:32, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> >
> >> I don't know why Patrick chose to
> >> not use that instead, but a local test seems to work.
> >
> > Is grub2 intended to be portable to
