Re: m4-1.4.19 not C99 clean ?

2021-09-13 Thread Bruno Haible
Paul Eggert wrote: >+ * lib/asyncsafe-spin.c (asm) [0x590 <= __SUNPRO_C && __STDC__]: >+ #define to __asm. Let me do the same thing also to lib/simple-atomic.c. (Untested, but "should work".) 2021-09-13 Bruno Haible simple-atomic: Port to Oracle Studio 12.6. * lib/s

Re: sigsegv.c: add OpenBSD/powerpc64 support

2021-09-13 Thread Bruno Haible
Christian Weisgerber wrote: > PASS: test-sigsegv-catch-segv1 > PASS: test-sigsegv-catch-segv2 > PASS: test-sigsegv-catch-stackoverflow1 > PASS: test-sigsegv-catch-stackoverflow2 Cool. Thanks! I've added the same support also to libsigsegv: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=libsigsegv.git;a=co

Re: sigsegv.c: add OpenBSD/powerpc64 support

2021-09-13 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Bruno Haible: > The patch looks right; it is consistent with > https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/src/sys/arch/powerpc64/include/signal.h?rev=1.5&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup > . > But has it also been tested? The test procedure is to create a testdir of > this gnulib module: > [...] > Which tests p

Re: m4-1.4.19 not C99 clean ?

2021-09-13 Thread Paul Eggert
On 9/13/21 7:11 AM, Eric Blake wrote: I'm not sure how much of gnulib still tries to cater to C89, vs. assuming C99. Gnulib no longer bothers with porting back to C89. However, this issue is due to a C99 compiler being pedantic, so we should fix it. I installed the attached into Gnulib on Sa

Re: m4-1.4.19 not C99 clean ?

2021-09-13 Thread Eric Blake
Adding bug-gnulib, since... On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 12:36:12AM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > Not sure if this is a bug if m4 is not supposed to be C89 or C99 clean > however I see : > > . > . > . > /opt/bw/bin/gmake all-am > gmake[3]: Entering directory > '/opt/bw/build/m4-1.4.19_sunos5.10_sp