Re: [PATCH] year2038: support glibc 2.34 _TIME_BITS=64

2021-07-16 Thread Paul Eggert
On 7/8/21 12:36 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: Doesn't this argue against _TIME_BITS=64 in general? It seems to be saying that one should just recompile for 64-bit, and never use _TIME_BITS=64. I think it does, but apparently 32-bit Arm is an outlier, related to DRAM sizes. I'm still not convinced

Re: possible bug in regex and dfa

2021-07-16 Thread Paul Eggert
On 7/15/21 1:48 PM, Arnold Robbins wrote: The regexp used there, ".^", to my mind should be treated as invalid. No, that regular expression is valid because "." matches newline in POSIX EREs. So the "." matches a newline, and the following "^" matches the start of the next line.