* Paul Eggert:
> On 7/7/21 1:45 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> Y2038 support requires recompilation. If you are able to do that, why
>> not recompile for a 64-bit architecture?
>
> Doesn't this argue against _TIME_BITS=64 in general? It seems to be
> saying that one should just recompile for 64-b
On 7/7/21 1:45 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Y2038 support requires recompilation. If you are able to do that, why
not recompile for a 64-bit architecture?
Doesn't this argue against _TIME_BITS=64 in general? It seems to be
saying that one should just recompile for 64-bit, and never use
_TIME_B
* Bruno Haible:
> Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> 64-bit file offsets enabled real use cases.
>
> Year 2038 is also a real use-case. It is not so rare that machines are
> being used for 15 years. (I still occasionally use a 14-years old
> computer, and had a washing machine that lasted 25 years.)
> Yea
