Re: two ill effects of maint.mk

On 6/20/21 3:15 PM, Bruno Haible wrote: Can someone please deal with this? Simon? Akim? Berny? Not always me :-) Something like the attached patch perhaps? (I haven't tested or installed it.) >From aa928d46db6902c06983237bea5ac3bebd3bfaa2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Eggert Date: Sun,

Re: two ill effects of maint.mk

> The line that causes these bad effects is in maint.mk: > export LC_ALL = C > > Probably this line made sense when maint.mk was still called Makefile.maint > and was independent. But since 2006 (or earlier) it is being included via > GNUmakefile. Can someone please deal with this? Simon? Akim?

Re: Fwd: guile-devel Digest, Vol 221, Issue 18

Hi Marc, On 2021-04-28 you asked: > In Guile's digest I noticed a comment about replacing libltdl (see below) > with the standard `dlopen' interface and providing a shim for systems not > supporting it directly. > > Do Guile's observations apply in general? libltdl provides two features: - por

Re: swab wrapper fails mingw.org's MinGW compilation of GDB

Eli Zaretskii wrote in : > The following snippet from Gnulib's unistd.h causes a compilation > error when building the current development version of GDB 11: > > #if @GNULIB_MDA_SWAB@ > /* On native Windows, map 'swab' to '_s

Re: sync with GNU gettext

> 2021-06-19 Bruno Haible > > Sync with GNU gettext. > * lib/tsearch.c: Ignore IN_LIBINTL. > * lib/localename-table.h: Likewise. > * lib/localename.c: Ignore IN_LIBINTL in some places. Some more simplifications of the same kind: 2021-06-20 Bruno Haible Syn