On 5/23/21 5:14 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
I agree that these handlers are _usually_ small and don't have nested
functions. But a restriction is a restriction, and should be documented
as such. Find attached a proposed patch.
Thanks, that looks good except please change "create nested functions"
On 5/23/21 4:19 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
Does everyone still agree
- to put into the source files a license header that is consistent
with the module description, and
- to remove the statement from the documentation
"The source files always say "GPL", but the real license
spe
Paul Eggert wrote:
> > Now, you are arguing "let's ignore whether programs use nested functions".
>
> Not at all. All I'm saying is, stack-overflow handlers shouldn't call
> via pointers to nested functions.
>
> There are already several restrictions on stack-overflow handlers; for
> example, y
Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> I'm discovering this project and attempted to run 'make check'. It
> seems to be finding problems, failing with:
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> [...]
> GPL?? lib/xstrtoull.c
> GPL?? l
